抗SmD1抗体对系统性红斑狼疮诊断性能的研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.福建医科大学 省立临床医学院,福州 350001;
2.福建省立医院 检验科,福州 350001;
3.宁德市医院 检验科,宁德 352000;
4.福建省立医院 风湿免疫科,福州 350001

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R181; R392.11

基金项目:

收稿日期: 2016-11-29
基金项目: 福建省科技计划重点项目(2014Y0009); 福建省卫生系统中青年骨干人才培养项目(2013-ZQN-JC-2)
作者单位: 1.福建医科大学 省立临床医学院,福州 350001; 2.福建省立医院 检验科,福州 350001; 3.宁德市医院 检验科,宁德 352000; 4.福建省立医院 风湿免疫科,福州 350001
作者简介: 陈敦雁,男,主管检验技师
通讯作者: 黄 毅. Email: hyi8070@126.com


The Study of Diagnostic Value of Anti-SmD1 Antibody on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Author:
Affiliation:

1. Provincial Clinical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, China;
2. Clinical Laboratory, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, China;
3. Clinical Laboratory, Ningde City Hospital, Ningde 352000, China;
4. Department of Rheumatology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 评价抗SmD1抗体对系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的诊断性能。 方法 采用ELISA法检测60例SLE患者(SLE组)、54例其他自身免疫疾病患者(其他自身免疫疾病组,其他组)、50例健康成人(对照组)血清抗SmD1抗体,间接免疫荧光法检测抗双链DNA(dsDNA)抗体,免疫斑点法检测抗Sm抗体、抗核小体抗体(AnuA)、抗核糖体P蛋白抗体(ARPA)。 结果 SLE组抗SmD1抗体水平与阳性率分别为31.55(13.98~128.84)U/mL及53.3%(32/60),明显高于其他组[13.48(12.50~19.80)U/mL,14.8%(8/54)]及对照组[13.62(12.50~17.93)U/mL,2.0%(1/50)(P<0.01)]。在5种SLE诊断指标中,以抗SmD1抗体对SLE的诊断敏感性53.3%(32/60)、阴性预测值77.2%(95/123)、准确性77.4%(127/164)为最高; 相关性分析显示抗SmD1抗体与AnuA,ARPA之间不具分布的一致性(P>0.05)。将抗SmD1抗体与传统SLE诊断指标(抗dsDNA抗体、抗Sm抗体、AnuA及ARPA)联合检测可将对SLE的诊断敏感性提高至71.7%(33.3%),且与抗SmD1抗体单项检测比较,差别具有统计学意义(P<0.05); 其ROC曲线达0.827,高于抗SmD1抗体单项检测(0.733)与传统SLE诊断指标联合检测(0.765)。 结论 抗SmD1抗体对SLE具有良好的诊断性能,且与传统SLE诊断指标之间具一定互补性; 将抗SmD1抗体与传统SLE诊断指标联合检测可进一步提高对SLE的诊断敏感性。

    Abstract:

    Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of anti-SmD1 antibody in systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE). Methods In serum samples from 60 cases with SLE, 54 cases with other autoimmune disease, and 50 healthy persons(control group), following were studied: levels of anti-SmD1 antibody by ELISA, anti-double strain DNA(dsDNA)antibody by indirect immunofluorescent assay, as well as anti-Sm antibody by immunoblotting assay, anti-nucleosome antibody(AnuA)by immunoblotting assay, and anti-ribosomal P protein antibody(ARPA)by immunoblotting assay. Results The level and positive rate of serum anti-SmD1 antibody in SLE group were 31.55(13.98~128.84)U/mL and 53.3%(32/60), which were significantly higher than that in other autoimmune disease group 13.48(12.50~19.80)U/mL, 14.8%(8/54)and control group 13.62(12.50~17.93)U/mL, 2.0%(1/50)(P<0.01). Among 5 SLE serological markers, anti-SmD1 antibody showed the highest diagnostic sensitivity of 53.3%(32/60), negative predictive value of 77.2%(95/123)and accuracy of 77.4%(127/164). Meanwhile, there were no significant consistencies on distribution of anti-SmD1 antibody with AnuA and ARPA in SLE group(P>0.05). The combined detection of anti-SmD1 antibody with conventional serological markers including anti-dsDNA antibody, anti-Sm antibody, AnuA and ARPA increased the sensitivity to 71.7%(33.3%), which was significantly higher than detection of anti-SmD1 antibody alone. Furthermore, the area under receiver operating characteristic curve ROC of the combined detection of anti-SmD1 antibody with conventional serological markers was 0.827, which was higher than detection of anti-SmD1 antibody(0.733)alone or the detection of conventional serological markers combined(0.765). Conclusions Anti-SmD1 antibody has favorable diagnostic value over the conventional serological markers, and it has complementary effect when used with the conventional serological markers in SLE. The combined detection of anti-SmD1 antibody with conventional serological markers contributes to increased diagnostic sensitivity of SLE.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

陈敦雁, 齐育英, 黄毅, 伍严安, 林禾, 高飞.抗SmD1抗体对系统性红斑狼疮诊断性能的研究[J].福建医科大学学报自然版,2017,(2):108-112

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: