Objective To compare and analyze the clinical application value of Da Vinci robot-assisted laparoscopy with traditional laparoscopy in cervical cancer radical hysterectomy. Methods The clinical data of 35 cases of radical operation for cervical cancer(stage ⅠB1-ⅡA1)were retrospectively analyzed. 16 cases underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical operation for cervical cancer(robot group)and 19 cases underwent traditional laparoscopic radical operation for cervical cancer(laparoscopic group). Following factors from both groups were recorded and compared amonge them: operation time, amount of bleeding, number of lymph node resection, recovery time of gastrointestinal function, time of catheter removal after operation, incidence of complications, and other factors. Results All 35 operations were successfully completed without conversion to laparotomy or change of surgical procedure. The operation time of robotic group and laparoscopic group was(303.26±52.33)min and(201.34±48.76)min, respectively. The bleeding volume was(67.38±17.26)mL and(90.34±33.21)mL, the recovery time of gastrointestinal function was(34.6±16.3)h and(53.9±11.6)h, and the removal time of urinary catheter was(16.70±6.33)d and(20.36±7.54)d, the incidence of surgical complications in the two groups was 12.5% and 21.1%, respectively. There were significant differences in the above indicators(P<0.05). However, the number of lymphadenectomies in the two groups was(35.21±14.33)and(33.18±13.54), respectively, with no significant difference(P>0.05). Conclusion Da Vinci robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in cervical cancer surgery, compared with traditional laparoscopic surgery, has advantages of less trauma and faster recovery.